So, the Toronto Star have changed their format (note - link is a PDF of the new style).
I can say I’m a fan. I mean, it’s hard to really ‘hate’ a newspaper visual format, and even a change as jarring as the Globe and Mail’s recent hyper-border-itis change was met with approval from me. The ULTIMATE critic of visual presentation.
First, the good.
-Slightly bigger text with an increased lead. I’m not (that) blind, but somebody else is.
-Focus on local news. This is a huge one. I read other news sources (BBC, CNN, CBC) for international or national news; I want something a little more ‘professional’ than Torontoist, Spacing or blogTO for my local news. (No disrespect to any of those sites; I read them regularly, and have much good to say about them.)
-Spiffy, slightly minimalist design in terms of text and dividers
-The ‘feel’ of the Star remains the same. The Star, Globe and Post all have widely different looks and atmosphere (as does any paper, really…duh), and for whatever reason, I like the Star’s the most. That hasn’t changed.
Now, the bad
-Slightly bigger text…does that mean we have fewer stories, or simply shorter ones? Presumably, the gains made in text size are taken from national and international coverage, fitting in with the GTA focus.
-”Voice of the GTA?” Come on, Torstar. You’re better than that. Even a “since 1892″ would have sufficed, if traditional. “Voice of the GTA” is just lame.
Now, my split
-One inch narrower. Not sure whether to put this under ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Under the good, less paper is always a positive. Under the bad, however, I’m again worried how much text has been chopped off. I’m sure it’s minimal, especially when combined with the increased focus on the GTA, and thereby less focus elsewhere. Though who reads every word of the newspaper, anyway?
Thoughts?
Side note - Today’s picture was from my train ride home from university for christmas back in December. It’s titled “December Sky,” and has undergone some post-process ‘enhancement.’